Retained search for institutions appointing to designated positions of formal responsibility, conducted through the client's ordinary governance cycle.
Four mandate types cover substantially all instructions. The distinction between them is lead time, and lead time sets the fee basis.
Pre-emptive placement
The officer is appointed before any exposure has been identified. Appointment, signing authority and information scope are established in the ordinary course of governance and are documented as such. Nine weeks from mandate to appointment.
Responsive placement
Instructed where a matter is already under review and a designation must be shown as continuously held across the period in question. Compressed search, expedited vetting, appointment through an extraordinary governance session. Eleven working days, priced at 2.4 times standard.
Standby panel
Six vetted candidates held in readiness against a defined risk profile, refreshed quarterly. Activation from panel in five working days. Used by clients with a recurring supervisory calendar.
Ministerial supply
Our public sector practice. Appointments to designated accountability roles across ministerial departments and arms-length bodies, including transitional appointments made in connection with a programme review. Our fastest-growing segment. Three weeks.
| Mandate | Time to appointment | Fee basis | Annualised |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-emptive placement | 9 weeks | Retainer per placed officer | 168,000 EUR |
| Responsive placement | 11 working days | Retainer at 2.4 times standard | 403,200 EUR |
| Standby panel, six candidates | Held; 5 working days to activate | 4,000 EUR per candidate per month | 288,000 EUR |
| Ministerial supply | 3 weeks | Flat fee per appointment | 60,000 EUR |
| Activation fee, all mandates | Same day | Payable on resignation | 250,000 EUR |
Custodial supplement is charged separately, at 9,000 EUR per month of any custodial term, and is passed through in full to the officer’s nominated family. Clients carry it as a reserve of 108,000 EUR per officer per annum against the standard actuarial assumption. Public sector mandates carry no such reserve and are priced accordingly.
Vetting is documentary and adversarial. We assume the officer’s record will be read line by line, in public, by counsel instructed to establish the point at which knowledge can be attributed. Candidates whose record does not withstand that reading are not presented, which is why our shortlists are three names rather than ten.
Client identity is not disclosed, and we do not confirm or deny an engagement to any party including a subsequent client. The following are described at sector level with the client’s written permission.
A European retail bank. A reporting officer designation had been vacant in substance for two supervisory cycles. Pre-emptive mandate, officer appointed in the ordinary governance cycle, dormancy of 26 months. On identification of the exposure the settlement was concluded with the institution, the officer resigned for personal reasons, and the product line under review continued to be offered. Share price recovered to the pre-announcement level in 34 trading days, against a sector median of 96 trading days for comparable announcements, which is 64.6 per cent faster.
A mid-cap manufacturer. A product recall spanning four markets. Responsive mandate, appointment completed in nine working days, activation eleven weeks later on publication of the technical findings. The findings identified a lapse in a named role. The design was not revised, and the tooling remained in service across the following three model years.
A national infrastructure programme. Ministerial supply. Political responsibility was accepted and the appointment concluded the same afternoon. The framework agreement, the delivery consortium and the specification were unaffected. Programme is ongoing.
Mandates are exclusive for the duration and for twelve months following. Fees are payable irrespective of activation, which is the point: a placement that never activates has performed exactly as specified, and the client has held an occupied position of formal responsibility for the entire period without ever having needed it.
We decline mandates in three circumstances. Where the information scope cannot be defined and recorded at appointment. Where the role carries no substantive signing authority, since an appointment the client’s own governance does not rely upon is not a search we can specify. And where proceedings have already commenced, at which point the instruction falls outside our terms of business.
On confidentiality. Client identity, the existence of a mandate and candidate identity are held under a single file reference and are not disclosed to any party, including a subsequent client in the same sector. Partners do not carry mandate detail outside the firm’s systems. Placement data is aggregated annually by an external auditor, and the aggregate is the only form in which it leaves us.</div>